Research Article
Print
Research Article
Habitat preference for nesting and foraging of Eurasian Spoonbill (Platalea leucorodia) in breeding season
expand article infoAbbas Naqibzadeh, Ruhollah Asgari§, Cezary Mitrus|, Attila Németh
‡ University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
§ Yazd University, Gandoman, Iran
| Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland
¶ BirdLife Hungary – Hungarian Ornithological and Nature Conservation Society, Budapest, Hungary
Open Access

Abstract

Wetlands are valuable because they support considerable ecological functions and are important in maintaining and sustaining bird communities by supplying abundant resources. Wetlands are ecosystems with high biodiversity and a hotspot of research that allows their inhabiting species to carry out their basic vital activities, such as feeding, sheltering, and breeding. Due to the sensitivity and rapid reduction of wetlands, biodiversity, especially waterbirds, will also be affected by these changes. Binary logistic regression (BLR) is a widely used technique in habitat modeling, particularly for presence and absence data, which applies maximum likelihood estimation after transforming the dependent variable into a logit variable. The Eurasian Spoonbill (Platalea leucorodia) is a waterbird species found in the Gadaman Wetland, where its presence is limited to the breeding season. Wetland succession can impact various wetland-dependent birds, especially during the breeding season. Therefore, the habitat suitability modeling is limited only to this season. The overall classification accuracy and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were assessed to determine the sensitivity and accuracy of the model. The model performance evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was found to be 0.993 ± 0.008, implying that the present model is effective. According to the results and data obtained based on the table of water depth and vegetation of Carex-Juncus spp. for foraging and Cladium-Cyperus spp. and Blysmus-Phragmites spp. for nesting.

Key words

Binary Logistic Regression, Eurasian Spoonbill, ROC, Waterbirds, Wetland

Introduction

Waterbirds, as one of the top food chain predators (Wang et al. 2016), are avians that live in and around water (Gokulakrishnan et al. 2014), and also depend on wetlands (Li et al. 2022) for foraging behaviour, food selection, nidification, and habitat preference (Cherkaoui et al. 2022). Therefore, they are the most active component of wetlands (Li et al. 2022) and play key functional roles in many aquatic ecosystems, for example, as herbivores and vectors of seeds, invertebrates, and nutrients, hence, the waterbird is regarded as one of the important indicators of the condition of the ecosystem (Wang et al. 2016).

Wetlands are valuable because they support considerable ecological functions (Maleki et al. 2019; Rosenblum and Schmeier 2022) and play a crucial role in maintaining and sustaining bird communities by supplying an abundance of resources (Zi-ling et al. 2021; Cherkaoui et al. 2022; Malekian et al. 2022). Thus, wetlands provide numerous beneficial services for humans and wildlife (Fournier et al. 2021; Malekian et al. 2022). In recent decades, these valuable ecosystems have been degraded by various forces, including wastewater, increases in water consumption, drought, and land use changes (Maleki et al. 2019). In wetlands, the distribution of surface water is one of the main determinants of species’ spatial distribution and individual movements (Acácio et al. 2021) and the Geographic Information System (GIS) is an attractive alternative to traditional field methods because it provides detailed attributed information across multiple scales (Liu et al. 2010) to investigate and predict the distribution of species and habitats. Despite increased understanding of the benefits of wetlands, evidence is mounting that wetlands are one of the most seriously threatened ecosystems across the globe (Boros et al. 2023), such that they are being lost at a rate three times higher than that of natural forests (Rosenblum and Schmeier 2022). Climate change (Gaudreau et al. 2018; Malekian et al. 2022), an increase in the human population, urbanization (Ulusoy and Bulut 2020; Chen et al. 2022), and drainage (Wang et al. 2016) are among the factors that lead to the disruption of ecological functions and ecosystem services of wetlands (Wang and Yang 2020). These ecosystems, in the world, especially in Asia (Chen et al. 2022), are disappearing, and the remaining ones continue to degenerate (Wang et al. 2016; Malekian et al. 2022; Rosenblum and Schmeier 2022). Due to the sensitivity and rapid reduction of wetlands, biodiversity, especially waterbirds, will also be affected by these changes. Birds can be susceptible to changes in habitat structure (Liu et al. 2010); thus, with the reduction of the area and degradation of wetlands, birds, especially waterfowl and waterbirds that depend on these habitats, are affected by these changes and exposed to danger (Ma et al. 2010).

Bird populations are dynamic; each species chooses habitats and specific parts for nesting. Thus, nest patterns may change with seasons (Rushing et al. 2017; Wang and Yang 2020). Hence, providing high-quality habitats for waterbirds is a critical issue in waterbird conservation (Ma et al. 2010). Eurasian Spoonbill (Platalea leucorodia) is a specialist waterbird that is distributed over a wide range in the Palearctic (Champagnon et al. 2019; Pigniczki 2022a), and this species is of key conservation importance as a flagship, umbrella, and indicator (Pigniczki 2017; Hunt et al. 2022). Most studies have focused on migration (Botond et al. 2022), breeding (Kralj et al. 2013), molecular biology (Cherkaoui et al. 2022), ecology and distribution (Carapezza 2020; Pigniczki 2022b), and diet (Surdo 2020). Due to geographical and ecological conditions, Iran has a wide variety of waterbirds (Khaleghizadeh et al. 2020). This area has become an important habitat in flyways for migratory stopovers, wintering, and breeding. This study evaluates and determines suitable habitats of the Eurasian spoonbills’ breeding status in the Gandoman wetland from the time of the species’ presence, such as nesting and incubating on the wetland surface, until the time of migrating and leaving the wetland. A statistical technique for productive modeling used in this study was the application of Binary Logistic Regression (BLR).

Material and methods

Gandoma Wetland in Iran, with an area of 980 hectares and an average height of 2220 m above sea level, is located in the Aqbolaq watershed, on the eastern domain of the Kalar highlands, in the geographical range of 51°04'42"E to 51°07'45"E longitude and 31°48'43"N to 31°51'24"N latitudes (Fig. 1).

This wetland is located downstream of Choghakhor International Wetland (Ramsar Convention 2023); therefore, one of the water outlets of Choghakhor Wetland enters the Gandoman Wetland. Eurasian spoonbill – hereafter Spoonbill – (Fig. 2) (Platalea leucorodia) population is listed as “The Least Concern (LC)” globally according to the IUCN Red List and Birdlife International criteria (IUCN Red List 2019; Xi et al. 2021; Cherkaoui et al. 2022).

Figure 1. 

Map of the study area, Geographical location of Gandoman wetland downstream of Choghakhor International Wetland and Chirro Lake.

Figure 2. 

Eurasian Spoonbills (Platalea leucorodia) in the Gandoman Wetlands (Photo by: R. Asgari).

Spoonbills come to spring wetlands (breeding season) in March to breed (Pigniczki 2017). April is important for breeding, but a few spoonbills still arrive at the breeding ground in late April. To survey and investigate the breeding and foraging habitats of spoonbills in the Gandoman wetland from the time of nesting and incubation of this species, monitoring and observation of the place of presence, feeding, foraging, and nesting point took place once a week from the end of April to the middle of July over three consecutive years (2020–2022). Based on the observation of adult birds during this period as an indicator of breeding (Pigniczki 2017), data on feeding and nesting were recorded using the Global Positioning System (GPS). Also, the depth of the nests and foraging places was measured. Since non-presence data cannot be considered as certain as presence (Imam et al. 2009; Alam et al. 2014), wherever evidence of a particular spoonbill was found, it was recorded as a “presence point” alongside habitats of other species. The presence of the spoonbill was not observed during three years of monitoring, and a “non-presence point” was marked. Google Earth Pro is used to estimate and determine the border area and to monitor and observe the spoonbills using a Swarovski 20×60 monocular telescope, the Steiner 8×30 binocular, and a Canon 50× spotting scope. Data, including environmental variables and the presence/non-presence of spoonbills recorded during fieldwork on the Gandoman Wetland, were analysed in ArcGIS 10 and SPSS 26. Logistic regression is a technique widely used in habitat modeling based on the presence and absence data (Alam et al. 2014), which applies maximum likelihood estimation after transforming the dependent variable into the logit variable (Imam et al. 2009). According to the purpose of the study, the most important factor for the spoonbill as a waterbird was the water depth (which depths it prefers for nesting and feeding), Because water availability is an essential factor for the richness and abundance of species, such that, avian diversity in arid environments also depends on the proximity to water (Boros et al. 2023). Vegetation was transformed into raster themes and used for further analysis.

Results and discussion

Apprehending the habitat resource needs, and factors that affect the nest-site selection and foraging due to species’ need for access to food resources (Sullender et al. 2016) and avoidance of predators, humans, and other species (Tayefeh et al. 2011), is a critical step toward understanding which wetland conditions support a diverse suite of species across the distinct annual cycles (Fournier et al. 2021). Disruptions are occurring constantly and severely in ecosystems worldwide, particularly in wetlands, and waterbirds are likely to be most affected (Sullender et al. 2020). Spoonbills have been used as an indicator of how bird populations are impacted by wetland drainage and other land-use changes (Sullender et al. 2016).

A Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to see the ‘strength of conviction’ of probability logistic regression scores that a subject falls into one category or another. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) varies from 0.5 (for a chance performance) to 1.0 for a perfect fit (Zarri et al. 2008). The ROC curve is a graphical representation of the trade-off between a test’s false negatives and false positives (Imam et al. 2009). The overall classification accuracy and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were assessed to determine the sensitivity and accuracy of the model. The level below the curve (ROC) is the probability of discernment power between the presence and absence data of a model. The model performance evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was found to be 0.993 ± 0.008 (Table 1), implying that the present model is effective (Fig. 3).

The coefficients derived from BLR (Table 2) were used as the weight for variables to integrate all layers in the ArcGIS domain to arrive at the probability/suitability map for the spoonbill. According to the results and data obtained based on the table of water depth and vegetation of Carex-Juncus spp. for foraging and Cladium-Cyperus spp. and Blysmus-Phragmites spp. for nesting, also based on Exp(B) value, it provides the chance of the presence of the species for feeding and nesting, which allows the prediction of the attention obtained by Blysmus-Phragmites spp., Cladium-Cyperus spp., and Juncus spp. for feeding and Carex-Juncus spp. and Phragmites-Cyperus-Cladium spp. for nesting.

Figure 3. 

Graph depicting the area under the ROC curve

Table 1.

Area under the curve.

Area Std. Error Asymptotic Sig.c Asymptotic 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
.993 .008 .000 .976 1.000
Table 2.

Result of logistic regression analysis.

B S.E. Wald Df Sig. Exp(B)
Depth (D) -.168 .070 5.817 1 .016 .846
Blysmus-Phragmites (BP) .023 .013 2.874 1 .090 1.023
Carex-Juncus (CJ) -.019 .010 3.350 1 .067 .981
Cladium-Cyperus (CC) .024 .013 3.117 1 .077 1.024
Eleocharis (E) -.011 .016 .480 1 .488 .989
Juncus (J) .009 .010 .715 1 .398 1.009
Phragmites-Cyperus-Cladium (PCC) -.029 .017 3.024 1 .082 .971
Constant -43.046 29.949 2.066 1 .151 .000

The ‘Habitat Suitability Index (H.S.I.) model’ provides an efficient and low-cost method for determining habitat quality (Imam and Kushwaha 2013):

H.S.I for Spoonbill:

[Exp(B×D)+(B×BP)+(B×CJ)+(B×CC)+(B×E)+(B×J)+(B×PCC)+ Constant ][1+[Exp(B×D)+(B×BP)+(B×CJ)+(B×CC)+(B×E)+(B×J)+(B×PCC)+ Constant ]]

The model is presented in Fig. 4 for the Spoonbill; the overall classification accuracy of 98.1% was observed with the probability cut-off value at 0.64 (Table 3).

Table 3.

Classification accuracy for Spoonbill modelling.

Non-presence Presence Percentage Correct
Non-presence 22 0 100.0
presence 1 30 96.8
Overall Percentage 98.1
Figure 4. 

Habitat Suitability Predicted for Foraging and Nesting of Spoonbill in Gandoman Wetland.

Gandaman Wetland, as the breeding and nesting habitat of the spoonbill, can be a corridor for migration in the geographical area because of the proximity of this wetland to the international Choghakhor Wetland. This research showed that the spoonbills in the Gandaman wetland choose different depths of the wetland for foraging, nesting, and breeding. According to the data analysis, it was found that the spoonbills choose shallow areas for feeding, while they build their nests in deep places. In addition to camouflage, the location of the objects among the reeds also protects the eggs and chicks from predators that threaten this species on land or at shallow depths. Water depth directly determines the accessibility of foraging habitats; thus, this relationship serves as the basis for the guidelines of wetland management. The vegetation is an important habitat element and greatly influences the habitat use by waterbirds. The waterbird population will increase with increasing vegetation cover in wetlands, especially during breeding periods when waterbirds are less mobile and more sensitive to disturbance. High, dense vegetation, however, can limit the accessibility of wetlands and adversely affect foraging and prey detection by waterbirds (Ma et al. 2010). Observations showed that spoonbills choose wetland areas with sparse vegetation for feeding, while building their nests among reeds because it is a safe place to stay away from predators and reduce stress.

Wetlands are ecosystems with high biodiversity and a hotspot of research that allow their inhabiting species to carry out their basic vital activities such as feeding, sheltering, and breeding (Liu et al. 2010; Ulusoy and Bulut 2020; Zi-ling et al. 2021). Wetlands cover less than 2% of the continental surface on Earth and continue to shrink (Ulusoy and Bulut 2020). Thus, those close to urban sites have a high chance of being converted to other land use types (Malekian et al. 2022), and the Gandoman wetland is no exception to this rule. Due to its proximity to the Chaghakhor wetland, the Gandaman wetland is a corridor habitat and even a corridor for many birds, including spoonbills, which spend the breeding season in this wetland and leave it in winter. Larger species with longer necks, bills, and legs can feed in deeper habitats than smaller species. According to the results obtained in this research, Spoonbills were feeding at depths less than 40 cm. The areas with this depth provided the preferred habitats, and foraging was more successful for Spoonbills in this area (Sullender et al. 2016). The Spoonbill is a specialist water bird of wetlands with shallow water because it can forage only in water that is not deeper than 40 cm (Pigniczki 2022a). Therefore, water depth is an important variable affecting waterbirds’ use of wetland habitats (Ma et al. 2010; El-Hacen et al. 2013; Xu et al. 2024). Selecting nest sites by waterbird species may depend on balancing factors that affect predation risks (Fournier et al. 2021). Some bird species select for vegetation structure rather than choosing habitat based on a particular land cover category (Liu et al. 2010). According to Table 2, the Wald value is obtained and used to determine the significance level of independent variables. Its importance is also based on the Sig. From these results, one can understand the importance of depth in the wetland for foraging and nesting of the Spoonbills.

Conclusions

The reeds of Gandaman Wetland are a suitable habitat for nesting, breeding, and foraging of waterbirds and waterfowl species. They are very effective in creating a shelter for the chicks and ensuring the safety of the eggs. The binomial multiple logistic regression for habitat suitability of the Eurasian Spoonbills successfully predicted the suitability of the habitat in the Gandoman Wetland, with most of the variables found to be significant predictors. Considering the wetland restoration measures that have been carried out in recent years and the construction of an earthen dam at the exit of the eastern part of the wetland, which has increased the water depth in the northern and central parts of the wetland and increased the area and range of reed plant growth, it seems that in in the coming years, the number of this species will increase in the breeding season. Generally, an individual wetland rarely meets all the requirements (foraging, nesting sites, etc.) of diverse waterbirds. Therefore, developing and maintaining multiple and complementary wetlands in an ecosystem can provide the resources that diverse waterbirds need. From a landscape perspective, other surrounding wetlands can influence the number of waterfowl species and their reproductive performance in one wetland. Although the development of agriculture and the proximity of the city may create threats to the wetland, due to the ecological conditions of the wetland and the presence of birds and even other species of wildlife, this wetland has become one of the prohibited hunting areas of the Environmental Protection Organization. Therefore, by monitoring and management, this wetland can be designated as one of the Important Bird Areas (IBAs) in Iran.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Use of AI

No use of AI was reported.

Funding

No funding was reported.

Author contributions

Conceptualisation, A.N. and C.M.; methodology, A.N., A.S. and A.N; software, A.N.; validation, A.S., C.M. and A.N.; formal analysis, A.N. and C.M; investigation, A.S. and A.N; resources, A.N. and A.S.; data curation, C.M. and A.N.; writing—original draft preparation, A.N.; writing—review and editing, C.M., and A.N.; visualisation, A.N. and A.S.; supervision, C.M. and A.N.; project administration, A.N. and A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Author ORCIDs

Abbas Naqibzadeh https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9120-154X

Cezary Mitrus https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9864-5696

Attila Németh https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4332-5596

Data availability

Data are available on request due to restrictions, e.g., privacy or ethics. The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

References

  • Alam SM, Khan JA, Kushwaha SP, Agrawal R, Pathak BJ, Kumar S (2014) Assessment of suitable habitat of near threatened striped hyena (Hyaena hyaena Linnaeus, 1758) using remote sensing and geographic information system, 1–11.
  • Boros E, Inelova Z, Lánczos Z, Végvári Z (2023) Waterbird guilds predict environmental attributes of inland saline aquatic ecosystems on multi-spatial scales. Science of the Total Environment 855: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158845
  • Botond KJ, Mihai M, Attila SD, Vasile A, Marta P (2022) The outstanding movements through Europe and West Africa of an Eurasian Spoonbill (Platalea leucorodia L., 1758) marked in the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve, Romania. Tom, 122–126.
  • Carapezza A (2020) The Heteropterological Exploration of Sicily. In: La Mantia T, Badalamenti E, Carapezza A, Lo Cascio P, Troia A (Eds) Life on islands. 1. Biodiversity in Sicily and surrounding islands. Studies dedicated to Bruno Massa. Edizioni Danaus, Palermo, 125–150.
  • Champagnon KJ, Cano Alonso L, Sundar KS (2019) An Overview of Eurasian Spoonbill Trends. In: Marion L (Ed.) Recent trends of the breeding population of Spoonbill in France 2012–2018. Arles: IUCN-SSC Stork, Ibis and Spoonbill Specialist Group Special Publication 2, 19–23.
  • Chen S, Zhang Y, Xu C, Cao L, Huang ZY, Li C, Boer WF (2022) Neighborhood threats: landscape context and anthropogenic changes can trigger waterbird population collapse. Landscape Ecology 37: 3141–3158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-022-01518-5
  • Cherkaoui SI, Hammoumi RE, Rihane A, Youssf LE, Aghzar A, Dakki M (2022) Geographical, Environmental, and Anthropogenic Factors Affecting the Occurrence of Wintering Eurasian Spoonbills (Platalea leucorodia) in Morocco. E3S Web of Conferences, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202233701002
  • El-Hacen MEH, Overdijk O, Lok T, Olff H, Piersma T (2013) Home range, habitat selection, and foraging rhythm in Mauritanian Spoonbills (Platalea leucorodia balsaci): A Satellite Tracking Study. Waterbirds 36(3): 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1675/063.036.0305
  • Fournier AM, Lancaster JD, Yetter AP, Hine CS, Beckerman T, Figge J, Hagy MH (2021) Nest success and nest site selection of wetland birds in a restored wetland system. Avian Conservation and Ecology 16(1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5751/ACE-01782-160106
  • Gaudreau J, Perez L, Harati S (2018) Towards modelling future trends of Quebec’s Boreal birds’ species distribution under Climate Change. International Journal of Geo-Information 7(9): 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7090335
  • Gokulakrishnan G, Dinesh J, Sivaperuman C (2014) Diversity and distribution of shorebirds (Charadriiformes) In South Andaman. Journal of the Andaman Science Association: 185–190.
  • Hunt ML, Blackburn GA, Siriwardena GM, Carrasco L, Rowland CS (2022) Using satellite data to assess spatial drivers of bird diversity. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 9(4): 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.322
  • Imam E, Kushwaha SP (2013) Habitat suitability modeling for Gaur (Bos gaurus) using multiple logistic regression, remote sensing, and GIS. Journal of Applied Animal Research 41(2): 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2012.739089
  • IUCN Redlist (2019) Platalea leucorodia (amended version of 2016 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T22697555A155460986.
  • Khaleghizadeh A, Sangchooli A, Tohidifar M, Ghasemi M, Musavi B, Bakhtiari P, Hashemi A (2020) Rare Birds in Iran During the Period 2011–2015. Podoces 15(1–2): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29252/JAD.2020.2.1.3
  • Kralj J, Mikuska T, Šetina M, Overdijk O (2013) Dispersal and migration of Eurasian spoonbills during breeding. In: Navedo JG (Ed.) Cantabria, Spain: Proceedings of the Eurosite VII Spoonbill.
  • Li D, Zhu S, Gao J, Jiang H, Deng G, Sheng L, Lin B (2022) The Influence of Ecological Engineering on Waterbird Diversity in Different Habitats within the Xianghai Nature Reserve. Diversity 14: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14121016
  • Liu C, Jiang H, Hou Y, Zhang S, Su L, Li X, Pan X, Wen Z (2010) Habitat Changes for Breeding Waterbirds in Yancheng National Nature Reserve, China: A Remote Sensing Study. Wetlands 30: 879–888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-010-0070-6
  • Maleki S, Soffianian A, Soltani Koupaei S, Baghdadi N, EL-Haj M, Sheikholeslam F, Pourmanafi S (2019) Wetland restoration prioritization using artificial neural networks. Wetlands 40: 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-019-01165-8
  • Malekian M, Salarpour R, Ranaie M (2022) Wetland characteristics affect abundance and diversity of wintering birds: A case study in South-Western Iran. Ecology and Evolution 12(11): e9558. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9558
  • Pigniczki C (2017) Dispersal and migration of a specialist waterbird: Where do Eurasian Spoonbills (Platalea leucorodia) come to Hungary from? Ornis Hungarica 25(1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/orhu-2017-0001
  • Pigniczki C (2022a) Winter distribution and migratory strategies of Eurasian Spoonbills (Platalea leucorodia) from the Pannonian breeding population: Are they long-distance migrants? Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 68(4): 341–360. https://doi.org/10.17109/AZH.68.4.341.2022
  • Pigniczki C (2022b) Observations on parental care of the Eurasian Spoonbill (Platalea leucorodia) during the post-fledging dispersal. Ornis Hungarica 30(1): 146–157. https://doi.org/10.2478/orhu-2022-0011
  • Rushing CS, Hostetler JA, Sillett ST, Marra PP, Rotenberg JA, Ryder TB (2017) Spatial and temporal drivers of avian population dynamics across the annual cycle. Ecology 98(11): 2837–2850. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.1967
  • Sullender BK, Barzen J, Silbernagel J (2016) Foraging success and habitat selection of the Eurasian Spoonbill (Platalea leucorodia) at Poyang Lake, China. Waterbirds 39(4): 356–364. https://doi.org/10.1675/063.039.0405
  • Sullender BK, Barzen J, Silbernagel J (2020) Effects of seasonal hydrological connectivity on Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia foraging ecology. SIS Conservation 2: 10–18.
  • Tayefeh FH, Zakaria M, Amini H, Ghasemi S, Ghasemi M (2011) Breeding Waterbird Populations of the Islands of the Northern Persian Gulf, Iran. Podoces 6(1): 49–58.
  • Ulusoy K, Bulut S (2020) Wintering Bird diversity and population sizes at Obruk Dam Lake (Corum) in Turkey. Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering 7(4): 353–358. https://doi.org/10.17350/HJSE19030000205
  • Wang R, Yang X (2020) Nestedness theory suggests that wetland fragments with large areas and macrophyte diversity benefit waterbirds. Ecology and Evolution 11(18): 12651–12664. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8009
  • Wang R, Wu F, Chang Y, Yang X (2016) Waterbirds and their Habitat Utilization of Artificial Wetlands at Dianchi Lake: Implications for Waterbird Conservation in Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau Lakes. Wetlands 36: 1087–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-016-0823-y
  • Xi J, Deng X, Zhao G, Batbayar N, Damba I, Zhao Q, Cui S, Jiang C, Chen Y, Yu Y-t, Cao L, Fox AD (2021) Migration routes, behavior, and protection status of Eurasian Spoonbills (Platalea leucorodia) wintering in China. Avian Research 12: 70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-021-00302-4
  • Xu P, Mao S, Zhang S, Bempah G, Zhao Y (2024) Habitat utilization of the Eurasian spoonbill (Platalea leucorodia) wintering in the Yancheng National Nature Reserve: relative importance of artificial habitats. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 12: 1357765. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2024.1357765
  • Zi-ling D, Meng-xuan H, Dan-ran L, Jia-rui L, Ling-xuan X, Peng-cheng W, Xun-qiang M (2021) Study on The Relationship between Vegetation Index And Bird Diversity in Beidagang Wetland. Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/791/1/012176
  • Zarri AA, Rahmani AR, Singh A, Kushwaha SP (2008) Habitat suitability assessment for the endangered Nilgiri Laughingthrush: A multiple logistic regression approach. Current Science 94(11): 1487–1494.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 

Spoonbills data

Abbas Naqibzadeh

Data type: xls

Explanation note: occurences.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (53.00 kb)
login to comment